says

A country with widespread human rights abuses is set to become vice-chair of the Kimberley Process scheme...

At a time when the Kimberley Process is facing more scrutiny than ever, is appointing a country with one of the worst modern reputations for miner abuse really the correct move to make?
A country with widespread human rights abuses is set to become vice-chair of the Kimberley Process scheme...

Note - This piece discusses the Kimberley Process, if you're not familiar with the scheme we'd recommend reading this article first.

It's common knowledge for those in the diamond industry that the Kimberley Process scheme is in somewhat of an existential crisis at the moment. Critics see the system as slow to effect change and generally ineffective at policing the global diamond trade as it was intended to do.

For many, the turning point came when the Kimberley Process decided to approve the sale of diamonds from the Marange fields of Zimbabwe, a diamond mining area infamous for its human rights violations.

The atrocities committed by the government-run diamond mines in this area continue to this day, with the most recent reports detailing a culture of corruption, violence and torture.

So it was surprising to us that Zimbabwe has just been announced as the new vice-chair of the Kimberley Process. There wasn't a single objection to this appointment from the 56 participants, which collectively represent 82 countries who have signed up to the scheme.

The decision will put Zimbabwe in a leadership position of the Kimberley Process for the year of 2023, taking up the mantle alongside Botswana as chair.

Zimbabwe's track record in diamonds

The diamond trade in Zimbabwe has been a human rights disaster ever since the vast resources of precious gems were discovered in the Marange Fields in 2001.

De Beers controlled the mines until 2006. Their withdrawal from the area led to an artisanal mining rush, until the government brutally took control of the fields using military force. 9,000 miners were arrested. Hundreds were killed. An estimated 35,000 were ejected from the fields which were their livelihood.

4 years later, the Kimberley Process approved the sale of diamonds from Zimbabwe in international markets, certifying them as 'conflict-free'.

Here's a non-exhaustive list of incidents that have occurred since that approval happened...

  • In 2017, villagers in Chiadzwa, close to the diamond fields, were forcefully evicted from their homes, with the promises of houses being given in another area as compensation. This didn't happen.
  • In 2018, police fired tear gas canisters at villagers who were protesting against the lack of transparency about where the profits of the locally extracted diamonds were going.
  • In 2019, it was reported that security forces apprehended several diamond panners who had trespassed onto the fields. They were beaten and then subjected to maulings by vicious dogs whilst handcuffed.
  • In October of 2020 it was reported that members of the Zimbabwe National Army, who guard the fields, extorted local businesses in the area taking almost all profits.
  • Local NGOs have accused the government-owned mining company of large-scale pollution of local water sources.
  • The supply chains involving Marange diamonds are routinely accused of smuggling non-certified diamonds into Kimberley-approved shipments.
  • In 2020, is a video emerged showing workers at a Chinese run mine in Zimbabwe being shot at. The dispute erupted after employers allegedly reneged on a promise to pay workers in USD, as opposed to the rapidly devalued local currency.

 

And despite all these atrocities, there's no sign of life in the local area improving. The villagers still don't have running water or properly maintained roads.

The Kimberley Process under the microscope

Looking optimistically at the situation, this appointment could be seen as the Zimbabwean government wanting to really work on the issues in their diamond trade.

But the fact that not one participant in the Kimberley Process objected to this appointment really highlights the collective timidness of the organisation.

The Kimberley Process was established to prevent the flow of conflict diamonds, but now has a country with widespread human rights abuses in line for a leadership position.

This absurd situation has been allowed to happen because the Kimberley Process only cares about diamonds that are used to fund violent rebels and other non-government conflicts. Diamonds that fund national militaries such as the Zimbabwe National Army aren't included in this ban.

That means 'Conflict Free, Kimberley Process approved' diamonds can come from utterly inhumane origins and still be certified.

The organisation has publicly stated it wishes to expand the definition of conflict diamonds, but for almost 10 years has failed to reach a consensus amongst members.

For this very reason, as a business, we put very little faith in 'conflict-free' diamonds. Traditional retailers use this badge as a synonym for ethical, but it couldn't be further from reality.

Instead, we choose to use lab-grown, Canada Mark or mined diamonds that include a Certificate of Origin, which clearly states the specific country where the diamond was mined.

Our hopes for the future

As an ethical jeweller, we couldn't let this news go by without commenting on it. And despite us trying to see the positive in this situation, it's hard to see how this appointment will help the Kimberley Process scheme make the dramatic changes it needs to in order to stay relevant.

The organisation needs to expand its definition of conflict diamonds to include factors such as forced labour, workers' rights abuses and the actions of government-run militaries.

If it can't achieve this, then it needs to step aside for a more robust certification scheme to take its place.

Zimbabwe is in a unique position where it can affect this change both in their own country, and all others signed up to the Kimberley Process. Whether or not it has the ability, or desire, to do this is a question only time can answer.

 

Image credit - © 2006 Associated Press

Further reading

Says

Christmas 2021 at Nightingale

It's that time of year again! Christmas and New Year are some of the most popular dates for popping the big question. And if you're planning yo...

Read More

Revealed: 2021’s most popular engagement rings and predicted trends for 2022

At Nightingale, we understand that an engagement ring isn’t just an accessory, it’s part of a moment often encapsulating a journey. Therefore, ...

Read More

We answer Google's top 10 questions on lab diamonds!

With lab diamonds surging in popularity it's only natural that more and more questions about them are arising. So what better time to sit down ...

Read More

The history of diamond engagement rings

Ever wondered how and why diamond engagement rings became the universal symbol of romance and marriage in modern culture? The origins might sur...

Read More

Pandora versus the diamond industry: Do lab diamonds harm vulnerable miners?

Last week Pandora made headlines around the world when they announced all diamonds used in their jewellery would be lab-grown instead of mined....

Read More

The Kimberley process - An honest look

Many diamond retailers use the Kimberley Process to display their commitment to ethical origins, but does this actually give buyers any gaurantees that the diamonds they're buying are free from human suffering? In short, no.

Read More

The true cost of diamonds

The classic rule when buying a diamond engagement ring is that it should cost 3 months salary. When the rule emerged it was great news for diam...

Read More